Did you know that poor product-market fit guides 34% of modern startups to failure?

User interviews play a vital role in achieving product-market fit, yet businesses struggle to determine the ideal number of interviews needed. Expert opinions differ on the recommended number of user interviews. Nielsen's famous "5 users" rule claims to uncover 85% of usability issues. Marketing researchers suggest 20-30 interviews to capture 90-95% of customer needs.

Academic research reveals even more fascinating numbers. A study analyzing over 2,000 PhD theses showed qualitative interview samples ranging from 1 to 95 participants, with a median of 31. Research also indicates that data saturation happens after just 12 interviews.

These varying numbers might seem overwhelming. We'll help you determine the right number of user interviews that match your research needs in this piece. You'll get informed results without wasting time and resources.

Why Sample Size Matters in User Interviews

Sample size is vital to determine how reliable and effective user interview research can be. The right number of participants will affect both insight quality and how resources are used.

Impact on research validity

Image Source: Eleken

The number of interviews you conduct will affect your research validity. Studies show that tiny samples make it hard to predict outcomes. Too many samples can increase the detection of differences that don't matter clinically.

Research shows that too few interviews might make you accept false ideas as true. This could lead you to draw wrong conclusions about what users need and want. These mistakes can waste resources and lead to poor product decisions.

Studies point out that data saturation - when extra interviews stop giving new insights - usually happens between 12-20 interviews for most qualitative research projects. A detailed look at 60 interviews showed that themes became saturated by the twelfth interview.

Cost and time considerations

Teams need to optimize resources when they plan user interviews. Research shows it takes about 1.15 work hours to recruit just one participant. This time goes up with specialized requirements. The average no-show rate of 10.6% means teams should recruit extra participants as backup.

Money matters become clearer when we look at time investment:

• A typical 5-participant study needs 6.9 hours of recruitment time

• This costs about $414 in recruitment alone, based on average researcher salaries

• Remote interviews save around $20 per hour compared to in-person sessions

The biggest challenge is finding the sweet spot between getting enough data and managing resources well. Studies show that your sample should not be so small that it hurts validity, nor so large that it wastes resources. This balance will give you quality research that's budget-friendly while keeping your findings reliable.

Common Sample Size Myths

Product development teams often make decisions based on several persistent myths about user interview sample sizes. Let's get into these misconceptions through empirical research.

The '5 users' misconception

Image Source: NNG

Nielsen's research in 1993 gave birth to the famous "5 users rule," which suggested that five users could uncover 85% of usability problems. In spite of that, this popular rule was meant for usability testing, not qualitative user interviews.

Recent studies show that 5 participants don't cut it for many exploratory research studies. A study that scrutinized 60 interviews revealed something interesting. Of the 36 high-frequency codes that shaped theme development, 34 appeared after just 6 transcripts. The codes stabilized completely after 12 transcripts.

More interviews always mean better results

Many people believe that more interviews automatically lead to better insights. The research tells a different story. Once you reach data saturation, extra interviews give you less and less value. A detailed analysis of interview data showed that:

• Code saturation typically occurs between 9-17 interviews

• Meaning saturation requires 16-24 interviews

• The median number of interviews needed for saturation is 12-13

One size fits all approach

Using the same sample size for different types of research can hurt the validity of findings. The largest longitudinal study shows that optimal sample sizes change based on:

The scope of research - tactical studies work with 6-8 participants, while foundational research needs 10-12 participants. Population diversity - homogeneous groups might reach saturation with fewer interviews, while heterogeneous populations often need 20-40 interviews to find common themes.

Marshall's research found that single-case studies averaged 23 interviews, while multiple-case studies needed 40 interviews. The right sample size ended up depending on research goals, participant criteria, and the topic's complexity.

Recent analysis shows that the fixed sample size myth has caused researchers to make two mistakes. They either recruit too few people and miss significant insights, or they recruit too many and waste resources. Success comes from understanding that different research goals just need different sampling approaches.

Factors That Determine Interview Count

Several factors work together to help determine the right number of user interviews needed for meaningful research outcomes.

Research goals and scope

Research objectives shape how many interviews you'll need. Studies show that:

• Discovery research needs 20-30 interviews to find 90-95% of customer needs

• Validation studies can work with just 5-6 participants

• Complex problems need 12-15 interviews for complete theme development

Target audience complexity

Your sample size depends on how diverse your population is. Studies with similar groups, like Type II Diabetes patients, can work well with 5 interviews. But broader studies, such as healthcare access research, need 20-30 participants to capture different viewpoints.

Project timeline and budget

Available resources play a big role in deciding interview numbers. Research shows that interviews without participant incentives take 33-50% longer to complete. The cost to fix product issues after development is 100 times higher than fixing them during research.

Team size and expertise

Experience level affects the number of interviews needed. Skilled interviewers can:

• Get better insights through smart follow-up questions

• Find themes faster during data analysis

• Need fewer interviews to reach conclusions

Interview structure changes when you'll have enough data. Unstructured interviews need more participants since topics change between sessions. Semi-structured interviews with consistent questions reach conclusions faster. Teams with experience can spot patterns quickly and need fewer interviews, making their expertise crucial in deciding sample size.

How to Know When You Have Enough Interviews

Researchers need to know when to wrap up user interviews by looking for signs that show they've collected enough data. The team must strike a balance between getting complete insights and avoiding repetitive information.

Data saturation signals

You can spot saturation through clear indicators during the research process. Studies show that saturation typically occurs between 9-17 interviews. Code saturation appears earlier than meaning saturation.

These signs tell you when you've reached data saturation:

• Patterns keep showing up in participant responses

• The codebook stays stable

• New interviews don't reveal new themes

• Participant feedback remains consistent across sessions

Research shows that code saturation - when no new issues come up - happens after 9 interviews. To fully understand the identified issues, meaning saturation needs 16-24 interviews.

Diminishing returns point

Each extra interview adds less value after certain thresholds. Research teams analyzed 60 interviews and found that 12 interviews captured 88% of emergent themes and 97% of important themes.

The research on interview data revealed:

• The first few interviews yield lots of new information

• New insights peak between interviews 6-12

• Interviews beyond this point add very little

Researchers should watch these indicators while thinking about their specific context. Homogeneous populations might reach saturation earlier - sometimes after just 5-6 interviews with specialized groups. Complex or diverse populations need more samples to achieve a complete understanding.

The decision to end interviews should rely on evidence rather than preset numbers. Studies suggest that researchers should analyze data while conducting interviews. This helps them spot when responses become predictable and new insights start to drop off.

Practical Sample Size Guidelines

Research and industry expertise show that user interview sample sizes change based on your research goals and context. Let's take a closer look at specific recommendations for different types of research attempts.

For exploratory research

We focused on finding and understanding user needs through exploratory research. This type of research needs enough depth to uncover meaningful patterns. Studies show these numbers for generative research methods:

• One-on-one interviews need 15-25 participants per segment

• Diary studies need at least 10 participants per segment, though 15 works best

• Mental model interviews should include 15-20 participants per segment

Without doubt, these numbers show how much we need complete understanding in early-stage research. Marketing researchers Griffin and Hauser found that 20-30 interviews help reach saturation by uncovering 90-95% of all customer needs.

For validation studies

Evaluative research wants to assess existing solutions or concepts. Research shows these numbers for validation:

• Moderated concept testing needs 8 participants per segment

• Unmoderated testing needs 15 participants per segment for better data quality

• Preference testing gets reliable results with 5-10 participants

Validation studies need fewer participants than exploratory research. Quick improvement studies need only 6-8 participants. This matches Nielsen Norman Group's finding that testing with 5-15 users uncovers most usability problems.

For in-depth investigations

Complex research questions that need deeper understanding require larger sample sizes. Research by Hennink and Kaiser looked at 23 peer-reviewed articles and found:

• 9-17 participants were enough to reach saturation

• Studies with similar populations reached saturation with fewer interviews

• Complex phenomena needed 16-24 interviews for meaning saturation

Sample size requirements grow with population diversity. Studies targeting multiple user segments often need:

• 20-30 participants for card sorting exercises

• 25+ participants per segment to measure studies

• 40 interviews for multiple-case studies

Note that these guidelines work as starting points rather than strict rules. The actual number of interviews you need may change based on:

1. The complexity of research objectives

2. The diversity of target users

3. The research team's expertise

4. Available resources and timeline

Research teams should watch data quality and saturation signals throughout the process. Studies show that similar populations can reach saturation after 12 interviews, while diverse groups might need up to 40 interviews to identify common themes.

Conclusion

The right number of user interviews is a vital part of successful product research and development. Research shows that sample sizes between 12-20 interviews typically achieve data saturation. These requirements vary based on research goals and target audience complexity.

Teams waste valuable resources without gaining new insights when they blindly follow fixed sample size rules or conduct too many interviews. Success comes only when we are willing to recognize saturation signals and understand if we have gathered enough data.

Smart planning creates the right balance between detailed research and resource optimization. Do you want to tap into the potential of your user interviews? Book a call with us to ensure your research delivers maximum value.

Note that different research objectives just need different approaches. Success comes from adapting sample sizes to match specific project needs. This applies whether you conduct exploratory research with 15-25 participants or validation studies with 5-10 users. The key is to monitor data quality throughout the process.