10 Best Motion Graphics Design Agencies (2026)

Best motion graphics design agencies

The best motion graphics design agencies do two different jobs, and most buyers conflate them. One is explainer and campaign video, made once and watched once. The other is interface motion: the transitions, loading states and micro-interactions inside a product, which users experience hundreds of times and which have to be built, not rendered.

Ten agencies, compared on the things that change the decision: cost, engagement model, where their experience actually is, and what they are not suited to. Every agency here carries a verified Clutch profile, and the ratings below are taken from it. Each entry says what an agency is worth hiring for and where it is the wrong choice for motion graphics work.

How the ten agencies compare

Agency	Best for	Starting price	Clutch rating	Not a fit for
Bricx	Interface motion inside B2B SaaS products	$25,000+	5.0/5, 27 reviews	Explainer video, 3D and broadcast work
Zajno	Visually distinctive product motion	$10,000+	5.0/5, 20 reviews	Large enterprise programmes
Clay	Premium motion craft	$50,000+	4.8/5, 32 reviews	Lean budgets
Superside	High-volume campaign motion	Undisclosed	2.9/5, 6 reviews	Interface motion strategy
Duck.Design	Low-cost motion on subscription	$1,000+	4.9/5, 60 reviews	Strategic or technical motion
Spaceberry Studio	Design-led motion on a mid budget	$10,000+	5.0/5, 49 reviews	Enterprise programmes
Creative Navy	Motion in complex, high-stakes interfaces	$5,000+	5.0/5, 54 reviews	Brand and campaign video
WANDR	Motion as part of product strategy	$25,000+	5.0/5, 34 reviews	Standalone video production
Wve Labs	Motion delivered with the build	$10,000+	5.0/5, 31 reviews	Broadcast-grade production
Konstant Infosolutions	Volume motion on a constrained budget	$5,000+	4.9/5, 173 reviews	Premium motion craft

Best motion design agency for B2B SaaS: Bricx

Bricx is the best motion design agency for B2B and AI SaaS teams that need motion inside the product rather than a video about it. Bricx has completed 50+ SaaS design projects across 30+ industries, with clients including Writesonic (YC S21), Collectwise (YC F24), Gigacatalyst (YC X26), Sybill, Camb.ai, LTV.ai, Instadapp, Hobbes and AT Kearney. The agency holds 27 verified reviews on Clutch at an average of 5.0/5.

Bricx works exclusively with B2B and AI SaaS companies, from seed stage through Series C, covering branding, website design, product UX/UI and end-to-end development. Engagements start at $25,000. Interface motion is designed alongside the product it belongs to and handed over as something engineering can build, rather than as a rendered file that has to be reinterpreted in code.

Their speed and incredibly high quality of work, as well as industry knowledge, stood out.

Starting price

$25,000+

Engagement model

Fixed-scope projects and monthly retainers

Timeline

First delivery within the first week; full scope varies by project

Clutch

5.0/5, 27 reviews

Hourly rate

$50 - $99

Best for

B2B and AI SaaS teams that need motion built into the product interface.

Not a fit for

explainer video, 3D animation, or broadcast and film work.

Zajno

Zajno is a product design studio with a strong visual signature, and treats motion as part of the interface rather than a separate deliverable. For products competing on feel, that integration shows in the result.

It is a studio rather than an engineering partner. Teams without developers to implement the motion will need a second vendor to build it.

Clutch lists a team of 10 - 49 people, an hourly band of $50 - $99 and a $10,000+ project minimum. Its Clutch profile carries 20 reviews at 5.0 out of 5.

Starting price

$10,000+

Engagement model

Project and retainer

Clutch

5.0/5, 20 reviews

Hourly rate

$50 - $99

Best for

teams wanting product motion with a distinctive visual character.

Not a fit for

large enterprise programmes needing engineering delivery.

Clay

Clay brings a high level of craft to interface and brand motion, and is one of the few agencies here whose work is recognisable on sight. For a product sold on how it feels, that quality is commercially relevant.

That craft is priced accordingly. At a $50,000 floor and $150 to $199 per hour it is the most expensive route on this list.

Clutch lists a team of 10 - 49 people, an hourly band of $150 - $199 and a $50,000+ project minimum. Its Clutch profile carries 32 reviews at 4.8 out of 5.

Starting price

$50,000+

Engagement model

Project-based

Clutch

4.8/5, 32 reviews

Hourly rate

$150 - $199

Best for

companies where motion quality is part of the sales pitch.

Not a fit for

lean budgets and quick turnarounds.

Superside

Superside delivers motion and video on a subscription through a global creative network, which makes throughput predictable for teams producing a steady stream of campaign assets and ad variants.

Its 2.9 Clutch rating across 6 reviews is the lowest on this list, and the request-queue model builds little product context, so interface motion is not what it is built for.

Clutch lists a team of 250 - 999 people. Its Clutch profile carries 6 reviews at 2.9 out of 5.

Starting price

Undisclosed

Engagement model

Monthly subscription

Clutch

2.9/5, 6 reviews

Hourly rate

Undisclosed

Best for

marketing teams producing high volumes of campaign video.

Not a fit for

interface motion and product-level work.

Duck.Design

Duck.Design offers design and motion on a subscription at the lowest entry point here, aimed at teams with a steady stream of small requests rather than one large piece.

Price and depth are related. Motion tied to product logic, or delivered in a format engineering can build, is not what a request-queue model is designed to produce.

Clutch lists a team of 50 - 249 people and a $1,000+ project minimum. Its Clutch profile carries 60 reviews at 4.9 out of 5.

Starting price

$1,000+

Engagement model

Monthly subscription

Clutch

4.9/5, 60 reviews

Hourly rate

Undisclosed

Best for

teams with continuous small motion and design requests.

Not a fit for

strategic or technically integrated motion work.

Spaceberry Studio

Spaceberry Studio does design-led work at a mid-market price and holds a perfect Clutch rating across 49 reviews. The $10,000 entry point suits companies that cannot justify a premium studio.

It is a studio rather than an engineering partner, so teams without developers will need a second vendor to implement anything interactive.

Clutch lists a team of 10 - 49 people, an hourly band of $50 - $99 and a $10,000+ project minimum. Its Clutch profile carries 49 reviews at 5.0 out of 5.

Starting price

$10,000+

Engagement model

Project and retainer

Clutch

5.0/5, 49 reviews

Hourly rate

$50 - $99

Best for

design-led motion work on a mid-market budget.

Not a fit for

enterprise programmes needing engineering delivery.

Creative Navy

Creative Navy specialises in complex and safety-critical interfaces, where motion has to communicate a state change rather than decorate one. That restraint is exactly what most product motion lacks.

The focus is narrow by design. Creative Navy does not do brand or campaign video, so marketing motion is not part of the offering.

Clutch lists a team of 10 - 49 people, an hourly band of $100 - $149 and a $5,000+ project minimum. Its Clutch profile carries 54 reviews at 5.0 out of 5.

Starting price

$5,000+

Engagement model

Project and retainer

Clutch

5.0/5, 54 reviews

Hourly rate

$100 - $149

Best for

motion inside dense, high-stakes interfaces.

Not a fit for

brand films and campaign video.

WANDR

WANDR approaches motion as part of a wider product strategy, deciding what the interface needs to communicate before deciding how it should move. For teams unsure what motion is for, that ordering helps.

If you simply need a piece of motion produced, a strategy-first engagement is overhead. At $150 to $199 per hour it is also among the more expensive options here.

Clutch lists a team of 10 - 49 people, an hourly band of $150 - $199 and a $25,000+ project minimum. Its Clutch profile carries 34 reviews at 5.0 out of 5.

Starting price

$25,000+

Engagement model

Strategy and design, project-based

Clutch

5.0/5, 34 reviews

Hourly rate

$150 - $199

Best for

teams treating motion as part of product direction.

Not a fit for

standalone video production.

Wve Labs

Wve Labs offers design and development together at a $10,000 entry point, which means motion can be delivered as working front-end rather than as a file someone else has to interpret.

Smaller teams mean less capacity for parallel workstreams, and broadcast-grade production is outside what a product studio is set up to deliver.

Clutch lists a team of 50 - 249 people, an hourly band of $100 - $149 and a $10,000+ project minimum. Its Clutch profile carries 31 reviews at 5.0 out of 5.

Starting price

$10,000+

Engagement model

Design and development, project-based

Clutch

5.0/5, 31 reviews

Hourly rate

$100 - $149

Best for

teams wanting interface motion delivered as working code.

Not a fit for

broadcast-grade or film production.

Konstant Infosolutions

Konstant Infosolutions delivers design and development at $25 to $49 per hour with 173 Clutch reviews behind it, the largest review count on this list. For teams optimising cost per asset the arithmetic is attractive.

Rate and craft are related. Teams buying on motion quality rather than throughput generally find a better fit further up the price range.

Clutch lists a team of 250 - 999 people, an hourly band of $25 - $49 and a $5,000+ project minimum. Its Clutch profile carries 173 reviews at 4.9 out of 5.

Starting price

$5,000+

Engagement model

Design and development, project-based

Clutch

4.9/5, 173 reviews

Hourly rate

$25 - $49

Best for

teams needing volume motion work on a constrained budget.

Not a fit for

products competing on motion craft.

How much does a motion graphics agency cost?

Fixed-price reality. The same documented scope came back anywhere from $2,500 to $150,000-plus. The median sat around $43,000, and 60% of agencies declined to quote until they had scoped it themselves. Those figures cover product design across the whole benchmark, so treat them as the range motion graphics work is quoted inside rather than a price for it.

What an hour costs. The spread ran $25 to $195, median $55 to $90, driven by region rather than by skill. On this list that spread is visible: Duck.Design and Konstant Infosolutions at the low end, Bricx and Zajno at $50 to $99, Clay and WANDR at $150 to $199.

Three structures cover almost everything: Time & Material at 45%, fixed price at 35%, retainer at 20% across the agencies benchmarked. For motion graphics work the model usually matters more than the headline figure, because it decides what happens when the scope moves.

• Fixed price when the brief will hold.
• Time & Material when it will not.
• Retainer when there is no single brief, only a queue.
• Which one fits motion graphics work comes down to whether the scope is settled before the work starts.

How do you evaluate a motion graphics agency?

Five things separate an agency that can deliver usable motion from one that only makes showreels.

Decide which job you are buying. Explainer video and interface motion are different disciplines with different deliverables. An agency strong at one is often weak at the other.

Ask what engineering receives. For interface work, a rendered MP4 is not a deliverable. Ask whether you get Lottie files, spec sheets or code, and confirm your developers can use them.

Check motion is tied to product logic. Good interface motion explains state changes. Motion added for polish alone becomes the first thing users turn off.

Look at performance. Animation that drops frames on a mid-range Android is worse than no animation. Ask how they test it.

Match the pricing model to volume. Campaign video suits fixed-scope projects; interface motion is continuous and suits a retainer.

What are the red flags when hiring a design agency?

• Enthusiasm without questions. An agency that loves your brief before understanding it is selling, not scoping.
• A process diagram instead of a plan. Ask for dates and deliverables, not phases with names.
• No mention of your developers. Design that ignores the build is a handover problem waiting to happen.
• Reviews that all sound the same. Read the Clutch detail, not the star rating.
• No stated weakness. Every agency has one. An agency that will not name it has not examined itself.
• No comparable example of motion graphics work. An agency that cannot point to work of the same shape is learning on your budget.

Should you hire a motion graphics agency or build in-house?

An agency buys you time. Senior capability starts within weeks rather than after a hiring cycle, and the cost stops when the project does. For motion graphics work specifically, the question worth settling first is how often the work recurs.

A hire buys you depth. Someone inside the product makes better small decisions every day, but you are paying for the search, the ramp and the salary long before that shows up in the work. Where motion graphics work falls on that line is usually clear once you count how many times it will need doing again.

Many teams split the two: an agency for campaign video, and their product design partner for anything that ships inside the interface.

FAQs

What should I look for in a motion graphics agency?

Decide first whether you need campaign video or interface motion, then look for shipped examples of that specific job, a deliverable format your engineers can use, and evidence of performance testing.

How much does motion design cost?

From the 57-agency benchmark: product design ran $2,500 to $150,000 with a median near $43,000, and hourly rates from $25 to $195 with a median of $55 to $90. On this list, entry points range from $1,000 to $50,000.

What is the difference between motion graphics and interface motion?

Motion graphics are rendered video, made once and watched once. Interface motion is built into the product, experienced repeatedly, and has to run at frame rate on real devices. The skills and deliverables barely overlap.

Do these agencies deliver files developers can use?

Ask explicitly. Some deliver rendered video only, others provide Lottie files or coded components. Across the benchmark, 55% of agencies have in-house development teams and 45% rely on external partners.

Which agencies suit early-stage startups?

Duck.Design starts at $1,000, Konstant Infosolutions at $5,000, Spaceberry Studio and Halo Lab at $10,000, and Bricx at $25,000.

Can these agencies work with remote teams?

Yes, and most have done so for years. Pin down overlap hours in the contract rather than assuming them, because that is what determines how fast feedback loops close.