11 Best UX Audit Agencies (2026)
The 11 best UX audit agencies, compared on pricing, Clutch rating, engagement model and hourly rate, drawn from a documented benchmark of 57 agencies.
Aug 20, 202611 min read
Best UX audit agencies
The best UX audit agencies hand back a prioritised list, not a document. An audit is only worth what gets fixed, so the deliverable that matters is a ranked set of problems with evidence attached, not a hundred-slide review nobody opens twice.
Ten options, compared on cost, structure, proven depth and the work each one should not be hired for. Every agency here carries a verified Clutch profile, and the ratings below are taken from it. Each entry says what an agency is worth hiring for and where it is the wrong choice for a UX audit.

How the eleven agencies compare
| Agency | Best for | Starting price | Clutch rating | Not a fit for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bricx | B2B and AI SaaS UX audits | $25,000+ | 5.0/5, 31 reviews | Non-SaaS businesses, academic research |
| Excited | Audits that end in a build plan | $10,000+ | 5.0/5, 55 reviews | One-off heuristic reviews |
| Adam Fard UX Studio | Audit paired with the fix | $10,000+ | 5.0/5, 34 reviews | Enterprise-scale analytics, large user bases |
| UXReactor | Research-backed findings, not opinions | $25,000+ | 4.8/5, 8 reviews | Fast, low-cost heuristic reviews |
| Fuzzy Math | Enterprise audits that survive stakeholders | $25,000+ | 4.9/5, 27 reviews | Standalone one-off audits, consumer apps |
| UXDA | Banking and fintech UX governance | $250,000+ | 4.8/5, 21 reviews | Non-financial products, exploratory audits |
| Boldheart | Audit feeding straight into a rebuild | $50,000+ | 5.0/5, 12 reviews | Standalone audits, design-only scopes |
| UX studio | Usability audits of live B2B platforms | $10,000+ | 5.0/5, 41 reviews | Deep single-sector domain expertise |
| Konstant Infosolutions | Cheaply implementing a list of fixes | $5,000+ | 4.9/5, 173 reviews | The audit itself, ranked findings |
| Creative Navy | Audits of professional and device interfaces | $5,000+ | 5.0/5, 54 reviews | Consumer growth funnels, large programmes |
| Halo Lab | Marketing site and brand execution | $10,000+ | 4.9/5, 99 reviews | Product audits, prioritised findings |
Best UX audit agency for B2B SaaS: Bricx

Bricx is the best UX audit agency for B2B and AI SaaS teams that want findings ranked by impact rather than catalogued. Bricx has completed 50+ SaaS design projects across 30+ industries, with clients including Writesonic (YC S21), Collectwise (YC F24), Gigacatalyst (YC X26), Sybill, Camb.ai, LTV.ai, Instadapp, Hobbes and AT Kearney. The agency holds 27 verified reviews on Clutch at an average of 5.0/5.
Bricx works exclusively with B2B and AI SaaS companies, from seed stage through Series C, covering branding, website design, product UX/UI and end-to-end development. Engagements start at $25,000. Bricx audits against the metric the product is judged on, then hands back a ranked list with the fix designed for the top items, so the audit converts into shipped work rather than a backlog.
Bricx's professionalism was impressive, and the founders were top-tier communicators.
- Starting price
- $25,000+
- Engagement model
- Fixed-scope projects and monthly retainers
- Timeline
- First delivery within the first week; full scope varies by project
- Clutch
- 5.0/5, 31 reviews
- Hourly rate
- $50 - $99
- Best for
- B2B and AI SaaS teams that want an audit they can act on immediately.
- Not a fit for
- non-SaaS businesses, academic research studies, or budgets under $25,000.
Excited

Excited runs audit as a named service and publishes the checklist behind it, which matters here because what is being bought is judgement about what to fix first. Its own account of a B2B platform redesign describes documenting every state in the existing product, including the ones nobody had intentionally designed, the unglamorous inventory an audit stands on. It also writes on UX debt and UX metrics, so findings arrive attached to a measure rather than an opinion.
Its 55 Clutch reviews cover design engagements broadly rather than audits specifically, so the public record for audit-only work is thin. And with full design and build capability in house, the audit tends to become the first phase of a redesign rather than a standalone read.
- Starting price
- $10,000+
- Engagement model
- Project and retainer
- Clutch
- 5.0/5, 55 reviews
- Hourly rate
- $50 - $99
- Team size
- 10 - 49 people
- Best for
- audits that need to end in a prioritised remediation plan someone will actually build.
- Not a fit for
- a one-off heuristic review with no follow-on work.
Adam Fard UX Studio

Adam Fard UX Studio is the only agency on this page whose published reviews name a UX audit outright: it enhanced navigation and search for a computer hardware manufacturer's website and ran an audit alongside it. That is the audit-to-fix sequence this page argues for rather than a report handed over at the end. It is 100% UX/UI, founded 2016, working from New York.
55% of its clients are small businesses under $10 million, so the audits on its record are of products with fewer users and less instrumentation than an enterprise platform. With a $10,000 minimum and 34 reviews at 5.0, the record is deep but weighted towards fixing what it finds rather than measuring it.
- Starting price
- $10,000+
- Engagement model
- Project and retainer
- Clutch
- 5.0/5, 34 reviews
- Hourly rate
- $50 - $99
- Team size
- 10 - 49 people
- Best for
- teams that want the audit findings turned into redesigned screens by the same studio.
- Not a fit for
- enterprise-scale audits across large instrumented user bases, or budgets under $25,000.
UXReactor

UXReactor's reviews describe the evidence layer an audit needs before anything can be ranked: customer journey maps, personas and need statements built for a data analytics company, and personas defined for an automation machinery manufacturer before mock-ups existed. A finding tied to a named user and a mapped step is arguable. A screenshot with a red circle on it is not.
Eight Clutch reviews is the thinnest public record on this page, which is a real limit when the thing being bought is judgement about what matters most. It is 100% UX/UI at $150 to $199 an hour with a $25,000 floor, priced for a research-led engagement rather than a quick read.
- Starting price
- $25,000+
- Engagement model
- Project and retainer
- Clutch
- 4.8/5, 8 reviews
- Hourly rate
- $150 - $199
- Team size
- 10 - 49 people
- Best for
- audits where every finding has to be defensible to a sceptical product team.
- Not a fit for
- a fast heuristic review, or budgets under $25,000.
Fuzzy Math

Fuzzy Math sells as much digital strategy as UX/UI, 30% each, which is the split an audit needs: the finding is the easy half and the ranking is the argument. Its cybersecurity client's review starts with a research phase before redesign, and 40% of its clients are enterprises over a billion dollars, where an audit has to survive several departments disagreeing with it.
Medical is its largest industry at 30%, so a consumer product owner is buying regulated-software instincts that may over-weight compliance findings. At $150 to $199 an hour since 2009, with a $25,000 minimum, it is built for engagements that continue past the audit into strategy and build.
- Starting price
- $25,000+
- Engagement model
- Project and retainer
- Clutch
- 4.9/5, 27 reviews
- Hourly rate
- $150 - $199
- Team size
- 10 - 49 people
- Best for
- enterprise B2B software where the audit has to be argued across departments.
- Not a fit for
- a standalone one-off review with no follow-on work, or budgets under $25,000.
UXDA

UXDA is the only agency here with a single industry, financial services at 100%, and it calls itself a UX governance partner, which is audit language: work measured against a standard rather than a taste. It names iGTB, Finastra, CR2 and Backbase among the banking vendors it has delivered to, plus HSBC and Emirates NBD, across 150 products in 39 countries.
The $250,000 minimum is by a wide margin the highest on this page, and at $200 to $300 an hour this is not a scope anybody buys to find out whether an audit is worth doing. Outside financial services, none of that domain depth applies.
- Starting price
- $250,000+
- Engagement model
- Programme-based
- Clutch
- 4.8/5, 21 reviews
- Hourly rate
- $200 - $300
- Team size
- 10 - 49 people
- Best for
- banks and financial platforms auditing a product against a governed UX standard.
- Not a fit for
- products outside financial services, exploratory scopes, or budgets under $25,000.
Boldheart

Boldheart is a venture builder by its own description, and its record is new things rather than examinations of existing ones: an MVP for a software company, an MVP marketplace for premium sports horses with an admin panel, and a four-app ecosystem for a food service company. An audit here is most useful as the front end of a rebuild it then delivers.
No UX/UI line appears in its service mix at all, which is led by mobile app development at 25% and custom software at 15%. Founded in 2020 with a $50,000 minimum, it is priced and staffed for a build, so a standalone audit is the wrong thing to buy from it.
- Starting price
- $50,000+
- Engagement model
- Venture partnership
- Clutch
- 5.0/5, 12 reviews
- Hourly rate
- $150 - $199
- Team size
- 10 - 49 people
- Best for
- teams who already know they will rebuild and want one team through it.
- Not a fit for
- a standalone audit or design-only scope, or budgets under $25,000.
UX studio

UX studio has the clearest audit-shaped engagement on the page: a chemical distribution company hired it to research users and improve the usability of existing digital platforms, not to build something new. Its case studies run to catching AI slip-ups before they cost insurers millions and building confidence in AI for high-stakes legal work, both of which are judgement problems rather than screen problems.
At 50 to 249 people with 45% enterprise clients, it is sized for programmes rather than a short read, though the $10,000 minimum and $50 to $99 an hour keep entry low. Its industries are spread evenly, four sectors between 15% and 20%, so no single domain is a specialism.
- Starting price
- $10,000+
- Engagement model
- Project and retainer
- Clutch
- 5.0/5, 41 reviews
- Hourly rate
- $50 - $99
- Team size
- 50 - 249 people
- Best for
- auditing a live B2B SaaS platform with real users to observe.
- Not a fit for
- work needing deep single-sector domain expertise, or budgets under $25,000.
Konstant Infosolutions

Konstant Infosolutions carries 173 Clutch reviews, by far the deepest public record on this page, and none of its published reviews describes an audit. They describe builds: a food delivery platform, a privacy-first AI assistant embedded into a biotechnology company's systems, and an insurance portal wired into an internal database. For a reader who wants diagnosis first, that record is about delivery instead.
UX/UI is 10% of what it sells, behind mobile app development at 60% and AI development at 20%. At $25 to $49 an hour with a $5,000 minimum, from 250 to 999 people in Jaipur, the value here is fixing a long list cheaply once somebody else has ranked it.
- Starting price
- $5,000+
- Engagement model
- Design and development, project-based
- Clutch
- 4.9/5, 173 reviews
- Hourly rate
- $25 - $49
- Team size
- 250 - 999 people
- Best for
- implementing a backlog of fixes at the lowest rate on this page.
- Not a fit for
- producing the audit and ranking findings, or budgets under $25,000.
Creative Navy

Creative Navy has a review that describes precisely the transaction on this page: an audit of a software solutions company's existing website to identify areas for improvement, followed by wireframes for the fixes. It is 100% UX/UI, and its case studies sit in professional software, an embedded GUI, a simulation tool and a surgeon-facing sonic cutter, where usability failures are measurable rather than aesthetic.
Medical is 40% of its work with automotive and manufacturing at 20% each, so the instincts are tuned to devices and regulated interfaces rather than consumer funnels. With a $5,000 minimum at $100 to $149 an hour and 10 to 49 people, a large multi-product audit programme will stretch it.
- Starting price
- $5,000+
- Engagement model
- Project and retainer
- Clutch
- 5.0/5, 54 reviews
- Hourly rate
- $100 - $149
- Team size
- 10 - 49 people
- Best for
- auditing professional software, embedded interfaces, or regulated medical products.
- Not a fit for
- consumer growth funnel work or multi-product programmes, or budgets under $25,000.
Halo Lab

Halo Lab's published record is website and brand production rather than diagnosis: a site for a nationwide mobile phlebotomy company, a visual identity and logo for a travel provider, and a Webflow build with interactive maps for a real estate agency. Nothing there is an audit of an existing product, and its own positioning is about brands reaching the top 1%.
Web design is its largest service line at 20%, with no UX/UI line published at all, and branding takes a further 10%. The 99 Clutch reviews and $25 to $49 an hour make it cheap capacity for shipping a marketing site, which is a different job from ranking what is broken in a product.
- Starting price
- $10,000+
- Engagement model
- Project and retainer
- Clutch
- 4.9/5, 99 reviews
- Hourly rate
- $25 - $49
- Team size
- 50 - 249 people
- Best for
- rebuilding a marketing site once the problems are already known.
- Not a fit for
- product audits or prioritised findings work, or budgets under $25,000.
How much does a UX audit cost?
Budget reality. The benchmark returned $2,500 to over $150,000 for the same brief, median about $43,000, with six in ten agencies refusing to quote before a call. Those figures cover product design across the whole benchmark, so treat them as the range a UX audit is quoted inside rather than a price for it.
What agencies charge hourly. $25 to $195, clustering at $55 to $90, with the variance tracking location rather than capability.

Pricing structures broke down as 45% Time & Material, 35% fixed, 20% retainer. Match it to your certainty, not your preference. For a UX audit the model usually matters more than the headline figure, because it decides what happens when the scope moves.
- Fixed price for bounded scope.
- Time & Material for evolving scope.
- Retainer for permanent design demand.
- Which one fits a UX audit comes down to whether the scope is settled before the work starts.

How do you evaluate a UX audit agency?
Five things separate an audit that changes the product from one that fills a folder.
Ask what the deliverable looks like. A ranked list with evidence beats a comprehensive document every time.
Check findings are prioritised by impact. Two hundred issues with no order is a way of avoiding a judgement.
Look for evidence, not opinion. Heuristics are a starting point; session data and testing are proof.
Ask whether fixes are designed. An audit that stops at problems leaves the hardest part with you.
Confirm the scope covers your actual funnel. Auditing the homepage when the drop-off is in onboarding solves nothing.
What are the red flags when hiring a design agency?
- Slides where the work should be. A deck about process is not evidence of shipped design.
- A quote that never moves. Scope changed and price did not means the estimate was padded.
- Junior work in a senior portfolio. Ask who specifically produced the pieces you like.
- No mention of accessibility. For anything customer-facing this is a legal exposure, not a nicety.
- Vague on ownership. Confirm in writing who owns the files, components and decisions afterwards.
- No comparable example of a UX audit. An agency that cannot point to work of the same shape is learning on your budget.
Should you hire a UX audit agency or build in-house?
Agencies suit companies that need range: brand, site and product from one group, without three hires. For a UX audit specifically, the question worth settling first is how often the work recurs.
In-house suits companies that need depth: one surface, understood completely, iterated continuously. Most teams need range first and depth later. Where a UX audit falls on that line is usually clear once you count how many times it will need doing again.
An audit is usually the right first engagement with any agency: small, bounded, and it tells you how they think before you commit to a build.
FAQs
What should I look for in a UX audit agency?
A prioritised deliverable rather than a document, findings backed by evidence, designed fixes for the top items, and a scope that covers where your users actually drop off.
How much does a UX audit cost?
Audits sit at the low end of the benchmark's range. Fixed-price product design overall ran $2,500 to over $150,000 with a median near $43,000; a bounded audit typically lands well below that. Bricx starts at $25,000.
Do these agencies offer development support?
Depends who you pick. 55% in-house against 45% partnered across the benchmark, so ask before scoping rather than after.
Can these agencies work with remote teams?
Remote work is the norm now. The question worth asking is not where they sit but when they are reachable.


