15 Best Webflow Agencies (2026)

Which Webflow agencies are the best?

Updated October 2026. Clutch ratings, review counts and minimum project sizes checked on October 5, 2026.

The best Webflow agencies in 2026 are Bricx, Flow Ninja, StanVision, Grafit, Refokus, BX Studio and Edgar Allan. A Webflow agency designs, builds and runs marketing websites on Webflow. The right one depends on the size of the site and who will run it after launch:

• Bricx for B2B and AI SaaS companies that need a Webflow site designed to convert and built so marketing can run it without engineering.
• Flow Ninja, BX Studio and Edgar Allan for enterprise Webflow sites: large CMS structures, migrations and a team that keeps operating the site.
• StanVision, Grafit and Amply for B2B SaaS marketing sites with a retainer for the pages that follow launch.
• Refokus for launches and rebrands that need motion and 3D; Finsweet for the hardest custom-code and integration work.
• Flowout, Creative Corner Studio and Excited for smaller budgets, fixed packages or monthly Webflow subscriptions.

Partner status, budget and the post-launch model narrow the list faster than portfolio style does.

A Webflow agency is a full-service design and development team that builds websites on Webflow, the visual, no-code CMS that lets a marketing team edit pages, publish CMS content and launch landing pages without an engineer. The best Webflow agencies do three jobs: design the site, build it as a clean system of components and CMS collections, and hand it to the team that will run it.

Figures from The State of UI/UX Design Agencies 2026, for which Bricx held sales calls with 57 agencies using the same brief (not every agency answered every question), and from Webflow's Certified Partner directory.

Quick picks by situation and budget

Start from the row that matches the job. The first three are the triggers that bring most software companies to a Webflow agency.

Situation	Shortlist	Why
The site no longer reflects the company, and the brand needs work too	Bricx, Refokus, Edgar Allan	Brand, positioning and the Webflow build in one team
A launch or a raise has a date	Bricx, StanVision, Amply	Small senior teams with Webflow-only delivery and short timelines
The site lives on WordPress and marketing wants control	StanVision, Veza Digital, Creative Corner Studio	Migrations are a core service; Veza Digital reports 500+ migrated sites
The site is large, multi-team and enterprise-reviewed	Flow Ninja, BX Studio, Edgar Allan	Enterprise partners with CMS architecture and governance work
The designer left and pages keep piling up	Grafit, Flowout, Amply	Monthly retainers and subscriptions for ongoing pages and tests
The build needs custom code, apps or deep integrations	Finsweet, Flowout, Webstacks	Custom code, Webflow apps and composable stacks
The brief asks for motion, 3D and a striking launch	Refokus, Excited, Bricx	Motion and creative development in-house
The design is finished and only needs building	Creative Corner Studio, Flowout, Finsweet	Figma-to-Webflow packages and hour-based development

Shortlist by stage and budget

Stage and budget	Shortlist	Pricing basis
Pre-seed or seed, under $15,000	Creative Corner Studio, Amply, Flowout	Clutch minimums of $5,000; Creative Corner Studio publishes projects from $12,000
Seed to Series A, $10,000 to $25,000	Excited, Halo Lab, Veza Digital	Clutch minimums of $10,000
Series A to B, $25,000 to $50,000	Bricx, StanVision, Grafit, Refokus	Clutch minimum of $25,000 for all four
Series B and later, $30,000 to $75,000	Flow Ninja, Grafit, Bricx	Flow Ninja publishes $30,000 to $45,000 project minimums
Enterprise, $50,000+	Edgar Allan, BX Studio, Flow Ninja, Webstacks	Edgar Allan's Clutch minimum is $50,000; BX Studio and Webstacks scope enterprise programmes
Ongoing work, no big build	Flowout, Amply, Creative Corner Studio	Subscriptions from $5,900/month, retainers from $3,000/month, hour blocks from $70 an hour

How the 15 agencies compare

Filter by Webflow partner level, budget, monthly retainers or where the agency is based, or sort by price, rate and reviews. "Webflow status" is the partner level or award the agency publishes.

Agency	Best for	Webflow status	Clutch minimum	Hourly rate	Clutch rating	Build stack	Ongoing model	Motion	HQ
Bricx	B2B and AI SaaS sites built to convert	Certified Partner; also a Framer Expert	$25,000+	$50 to $99	5.0/5, 32 reviews	Webflow, Framer, custom code	Retainer from $10,000/month	Yes, incl. product video	Dubai and New Delhi
Flow Ninja	Enterprise Webflow sites run as WebOps	Enterprise Partner; Enterprise Partner of the Year 2023	$10,000+	$50 to $99	4.9/5, 56 reviews	Webflow	Retainer from $6,000/month, 12 months	Yes	Belgrade, Serbia
StanVision	B2B SaaS teams moving to Webflow	Premium Partner	$25,000+	$50 to $99	5.0/5, 21 reviews	Webflow, HubSpot	Retainer, team extension	Yes	Sofia, Bulgaria
Grafit	SaaS sites with a growth retainer	Enterprise Partner	$25,000+	$100 to $149	5.0/5, 28 reviews	Webflow	Monthly growth retainer	Yes	Warsaw, Poland
Refokus	Launch sites with motion and 3D	Agency of the Year nominee 2022, 2023, 2025	$25,000+	$100 to $149	5.0/5, 10 reviews	Webflow, Framer, custom code	Not published	Yes	Not published
BX Studio	Enterprise CMS and migrations	Enterprise Partner of the Year 2025	No Clutch profile	Not published	No Clutch profile	Webflow, Framer	Ongoing support	Not advertised	Los Angeles, US
Edgar Allan	Brand-led enterprise Webflow sites	Enterprise Partner; Agency of the Year 2022 and 2023	$50,000+	$100 to $149	5.0/5, 8 reviews	Webflow	Ongoing support	Not advertised	Atlanta, US
Finsweet	Custom code, apps and integrations	Enterprise Partner	No Clutch profile	Not published	No Clutch profile	Webflow, custom code, Wized	Hour-based contracts, maintenance	Not advertised	US, remote
Amply	Webflow work on smaller budgets	Premium Partner, approved for Enterprise	$5,000+	$100 to $149	4.9/5, 7 reviews	Webflow	Retainer from $3,000/month	Yes	Not published
Flowout	Webflow subscription for SaaS marketing teams	Enterprise Partner	$5,000+	$50 to $99	4.9/5, 53 reviews	Webflow, custom code, Webflow apps	Subscription from $5,900/month	Add-on	Maribor, Slovenia
Veza Digital	WordPress or HubSpot to Webflow migrations	Enterprise Partner	$10,000+	$150 to $199	4.9/5, 45 reviews	Webflow, HubSpot	Veza CARE retainer	Not advertised	Toronto, Canada
Creative Corner Studio	Fixed-price builds and hour-block retainers	Premium Partner, Enterprise	$5,000+	$50 to $99	5.0/5, 24 reviews	Webflow	Hour blocks from $70 an hour	Not advertised	Sofia, Bulgaria
Webstacks	Enterprise composable websites	Not published	$10,000+	$200 to $300	5.0/5, 3 reviews	Next.js, headless CMS, Webflow	Retainer	Yes	San Diego, US
Excited	Design-led SaaS sites built in Webflow	Not published	$10,000+	$50 to $99	5.0/5, 56 reviews	Webflow	Post-launch support	Yes	Lviv, Ukraine
Halo Lab	Website plus product on a low hourly rate	Not published	$10,000+	$25 to $49	4.9/5, 100 reviews	Webflow, React, Next.js	Dedicated monthly team	Not advertised	Dubai, UAE

"Not advertised" means the agency's own site does not list the service; it may still offer it on request. "No Clutch profile" means no profile could be matched to the agency's own website.

How these agencies were picked

Every agency on this list was assessed against the same evidence a buyer can check, with the rigour Bricx applied when it benchmarked 57 agencies on one identical brief for The State of UI/UX Design Agencies 2026. Each of the top Webflow agencies below had to clear three bars:

1. A strong, verified track record. Consistent, recent client reviews on Clutch, or a portfolio of shipped Webflow sites used at scale.
2. Real Webflow and software work. Live Webflow websites for software or B2B companies, named on the agency's site, in case studies or in verified reviews.
3. Published facts. Minimum project size, hourly rate, team size and location from Clutch, checked on October 5, 2026. Partner status, pricing and services come from each agency's own site; Webflow Awards results come from the agency and from published award records. Outcome numbers appear only where a client stated them in a Clutch review or the agency published them, and each one says which.

Agencies are ordered by fit for funded B2B and SaaS companies across industries, hiring a Webflow web design agency for a new site, a migration or ongoing work. Pricing and timeline benchmarks come from The State of UI/UX Design Agencies 2026, which sent the same 5-page brief, with copywriting and a Webflow or Framer build, to 57 agencies.

The 15 agencies, reviewed

Each entry gives the verdict and key facts first; open the full review for evidence and limits. Names link to agency sites, ratings to Clutch.

Best Webflow agency for B2B and AI SaaS sites built to convert: Bricx

Bricx is the best Webflow agency for B2B and AI SaaS companies that need a site designed to convert and built so marketing can run it without engineering. Bricx has shipped 50+ websites in the last two years for clients including Writesonic (YC S21), Sybill, CAMB.AI, LTV.ai and Hobbes, with larger, SEO-heavy sites such as CAMB.AI's built in Webflow.

Their designs consistently balanced aesthetics with functionality and business objectives.

Starting price

$25,000+ for design and Webflow build; retainers from $10,000/month

Hourly rate

$50 to $99

Clutch

5.0/5, 32 reviews

Team and HQ

10 to 49 people, Dubai and New Delhi

Webflow status

Certified Partner (also a Framer Expert)

Stack

Webflow, Framer, custom code (Next.js)

Typical timeline

Five to six weeks for design and Webflow build; two to three weeks from finished designs

Engagement model

Fixed-scope projects, monthly retainers, embedded teams, paid pilot sprints

Best for

B2B and AI SaaS teams that need a conversion-led Webflow site marketing can run on its own

Not a fit for

Non-software businesses and budgets under $25,000

Full review of Bricx

Projects open with wireframes and three to five hero-section directions, then every page and state is designed in Figma before the build. The Webflow build uses a documented class system and reusable components, and Bricx builds through the Webflow MCP, which accelerates about 80% of the build and leaves the schedule for the visual detail. Its Webflow development for B2B SaaS page quotes two to three weeks against finished designs and five to six weeks for design and build together. Copy is written by the client or by Bricx, whichever the team prefers. The site is built in Bricx's workspace and transferred to the client's. In Clutch reviews, Scale.jobs' CTO reported visitor-to-lead conversion rising from 1.2% to 2.8% in the first month after a redesign, and Billdr's CEO reported delivery about three weeks ahead of schedule.

Flow Ninja

Flow Ninja describes itself as a WebOps team for Webflow: it builds large marketing sites and then runs them on a retainer. It won Webflow's Enterprise Partner of the Year award in 2023, and its software clients include Upwork, Uberall, Invoca and Trustly. A fintech client reported page loads about 40% faster after the rebuild.

What impressed us most was the combination of deep Webflow expertise and genuine ownership of the project.

Starting price

$10,000+ on Clutch; $30,000 to $45,000 on its pricing page

Hourly rate

$50 to $99

Clutch

4.9/5, 56 reviews

Team and HQ

50 to 249 people, Belgrade, Serbia

Stack

Webflow (Enterprise Partner)

Engagement model

Projects; retainers from $6,000/month on a 12-month term

Best for

Enterprise Webflow sites that need a team operating them after launch

Not a fit for

Teams that want a one-off build and no retainer

Full review of Flow Ninja

The model is strongest after launch: messaging and copy, motion and illustration, migrations and SEO and AEO work run as one continuous programme. Retainers start at $6,000 a month on a 12-month commitment, so the real budget is the build plus a year of operations. Its pricing page quotes $30,000 to $45,000 project minimums against $10,000+ on Clutch; ask for a scoped quote early. Flow Ninja is also unusually open about what Webflow does badly, with a page on CMS limits, e-commerce complexity and custom functionality.

StanVision

StanVision positions itself as the Webflow agency for B2B SaaS products, covering branding and positioning, Webflow development, migrations and maintenance as a Webflow Premium Partner. Clients include Primer, Rillet, Blee and Timefold. Blee's head of marketing reported on Clutch that session views rose 176% year on year within two months of launch.

They don't just agree with everything we ask; they challenge us in a healthy way.

Starting price

$25,000+

Hourly rate

$50 to $99

Clutch

5.0/5, 21 reviews

Team and HQ

10 to 49 people, Sofia, Bulgaria

Stack

Webflow (Premium Partner), HubSpot

Engagement model

Projects, retainers, team extension

Best for

B2B SaaS teams migrating to Webflow

Not a fit for

Headless or custom-coded builds

Full review of StanVision

StanVision works almost entirely in Webflow, a strength for marketing-run sites and a limit for teams that need a headless build. The agency reports that Gridwise lifted conversions 24% after a WordPress to Webflow migration. It also designs product interfaces, which helps when the site has to show real product UI. The Sofia team pairs mid-range rates with a $25,000 minimum, so it suits funded companies more than pre-seed budgets, and long retainers are its normal model.

Grafit

Grafit is a Webflow Enterprise Partner building B2B SaaS websites with a component-based architecture, plus a monthly website growth retainer for new pages and tests. Clients include Clay (the GTM platform), Gentrace, Callstack and Jace AI. Messaging and content structure are part of web projects, and motion and product video are a separate service.

Their proactive approach, coupled with their expertise, made managing this project a breeze.

Starting price

$25,000+

Hourly rate

$100 to $149

Clutch

5.0/5, 28 reviews

Team and HQ

10 to 49 people, Warsaw, Poland

Stack

Webflow (Enterprise Partner)

Engagement model

Projects, monthly website growth retainer

Best for

SaaS teams that want a Webflow partner for growth work after launch

Not a fit for

Teams wanting copywriting bundled into one fee

Full review of Grafit

Grafit reports a 3x increase in Gentrace signups after a redesign and sharper messaging, an agency-published figure. Copywriting is priced separately, and most public Clutch reviews date from 2022 and 2023 and cover non-SaaS work, so recent SaaS case studies are the better evidence. Clutch lists Warsaw as headquarters while the site lists an Austin address; confirm where the delivery team sits.

Refokus

Refokus designs and develops sites in Webflow and Framer, often extended with custom code, 3D and creative development. It lists Webflow Agency of the Year nominations in 2022, 2023 and 2025, and counts Webflow itself, Weglot, Chargeflow and deepset among its clients. Silvr's head of brand reported average engagement time up 17% within two months.

We felt like Refokus was a part of our in-house team.

Starting price

$25,000+

Hourly rate

$100 to $149

Clutch

5.0/5, 10 reviews

Team

10 to 49 people

Stack

Webflow, Framer, custom code

Engagement model

Not published

Best for

Launches and rebrands that need standout motion and 3D

Not a fit for

Teams that want a low-maintenance, conservative site

Full review of Refokus

Having Webflow itself as a client is a strong signal of craft. The work leans visual and ambitious, which suits a launch or a rebrand more than a steady flow of landing pages, and heavy interactions add maintenance. Refokus does not publish engagement models or a headquarters, and its Clutch profile holds ten reviews, so confirm the team, process and post-launch support directly.

BX Studio

BX Studio is a remote-first Webflow agency based in Los Angeles that won Webflow's Enterprise Partner of the Year award in 2025. Its client list includes Reddit, Headspace, Verifone, Gorgias, BuildOps and Blockaid, and its services cover custom sites and migrations, SEO and AEO, analytics and ongoing support. It also lists Framer Expert status.

Starting price

Not published

Hourly rate

Not published

Clutch

No Clutch profile found

Team and HQ

Remote-first, Los Angeles, CA

Stack

Webflow (Enterprise Partner), Framer

Engagement model

Projects and ongoing website support

Best for

Enterprise teams migrating large sites onto Webflow

Not a fit for

Seed-stage teams with a small site and a tight budget

Full review of BX Studio

BX Studio won a Webflow Award for Business Impact for Headspace's B2B site and has spoken at Webflow Conf in four of the past five years. The work is CMS architecture, component systems, performance and migrations rather than visual experiments. With no Clutch profile and no published pricing, references from its enterprise clients are the main check, and the budget conversation has to happen on the first call.

Edgar Allan

Edgar Allan is a Webflow Enterprise Partner in Atlanta that pairs brand strategy with Webflow builds for mid-market and enterprise companies. It won Webflow's Agency of the Year award in 2022 and 2023 and Enterprise Excellence in 2024. Inbox Monster's head of brand reported site traffic up more than 30% and three times the leads after launch.

The project management was a highlight.

Starting price

$50,000+

Hourly rate

$100 to $149

Clutch

5.0/5, 8 reviews

Team and HQ

50 to 249 people, Atlanta, GA

Stack

Webflow (Enterprise Partner)

Engagement model

Brand and website projects, ongoing support

Best for

Mid-market and enterprise brands relaunching brand and Webflow site together

Not a fit for

Budgets under $50,000

Full review of Edgar Allan

Recent Clutch reviews come from NCR Atleos, OTR Solutions, Premji Invest and Inbox Monster. They praise the depth of Webflow knowledge and the training that lets a client run the site. The same Inbox Monster review wished for more SEO and AEO work before launch and more technical documentation, so put both in the scope. The $50,000 minimum is the highest on Clutch among the agencies here.

Finsweet

Finsweet is a US-based, fully remote Webflow team founded in 2016 that builds websites and web apps for B2B companies. It created Client-First, the class-naming system many Webflow developers use, plus Attributes and Wized. Clients include Dropbox, Vanta, GitHub, WeTransfer and Aura, and the company reports 500+ completed projects.

Starting price

Not published; contracts built from selected services and hours

Hourly rate

Not published

Clutch

No Clutch profile found

Team and HQ

50+ people, fully remote, US

Stack

Webflow (Enterprise Partner), custom code, Wized, Webflow integrations

Engagement model

Self-service hour-based contracts, long-term maintenance

Best for

Complex builds that need custom code, integrations or app-like features

Not a fit for

Rebrands where positioning is the main problem

Full review of Finsweet

Finsweet's tools are a large part of why so many Webflow builds are maintainable. Its services run from design and development to SEO and CRO, AI and automation, integrations, business apps and HIPAA-compliant apps for healthcare companies. Edgar Allan's analysis of four years of Webflow Awards counts three Agency of the Year finalist nominations for Finsweet. With no Clutch profile, the testimonials on its own site and its client list are the evidence; ask for references from software clients.

Amply

Amply is a Webflow Premium Partner, approved for Enterprise builds, working with B2B and SaaS companies including Mural, Zenhub and Workstreet on migrations, redesigns and ongoing Webflow work. It sells one-time website packages and monthly retainers that bundle design, Webflow development and motion.

Amply's designers knew the strategy and were able to drive the conversation.

Starting price

$5,000+

Hourly rate

$100 to $149

Clutch

4.9/5, 7 reviews

Team

10 to 49 people

Stack

Webflow (Premium Partner)

Engagement model

Website packages; retainers from $3,000/month

Best for

Webflow migrations and ongoing site work on smaller budgets

Not a fit for

Custom-coded or headless builds

Full review of Amply

Amply's retainers are published: Webflow development from $3,000 a month, design plus Webflow from $4,500, and a dedicated team from $10,000. That makes it one of the easier agencies here to budget for. Its Clutch profile holds seven reviews and it does not publish a headquarters; for a full repositioning, confirm how much strategy the package includes.

Flowout

Flowout is a Webflow Enterprise Partner in Maribor, Slovenia that sells Webflow design and development as a monthly subscription for marketing teams. Clients include Jasper, Kajabi, Riverside and ActiveCampaign, for which it built the ActiveCampaign app for Webflow in 12 weeks, according to ActiveCampaign's Clutch review.

What truly sets FlowOut apart is the rare blend of rigorous process and genuine partnership.

Starting price

$5,000+ on Clutch; subscriptions from $5,900/month

Hourly rate

$50 to $99

Clutch

4.9/5, 53 reviews

Team and HQ

50 to 249 people, Maribor, Slovenia

Stack

Webflow (Enterprise Partner), custom code, Webflow apps

Engagement model

Monthly subscriptions, hour packages, projects

Best for

SaaS marketing teams that want a Webflow team on tap every month

Not a fit for

A single fixed-scope relaunch with no ongoing work

Full review of Flowout

Pricing is published: $5,900 a month for development only, $7,900 with design and $9,900 with design and copywriting on monthly billing. Quarterly and annual terms are discounted, and hour packages start at $2,500 for 25 hours. Motion, an extra developer or an extra designer are paid add-ons. The subscription suits a steady stream of pages and experiments more than a positioning-led rebrand.

Veza Digital

Veza Digital is a Webflow Enterprise Partner with offices in Toronto, New York and Dubai that designs and builds B2B websites and migrates them from WordPress and HubSpot. Its Clutch profile says it has migrated 500+ sites to Webflow. SaaS clients include Chili Piper, Liquibase, Northbeam, Grata and Kizen.

They went out of their way to help us meet our deadlines.

Starting price

$10,000+

Hourly rate

$150 to $199

Clutch

4.9/5, 45 reviews

Team and HQ

50 to 249 people, Toronto, Canada

Stack

Webflow (Enterprise Partner), HubSpot, CRM integrations

Engagement model

Scoped projects; Veza CARE and managed Webflow Enterprise services

Best for

B2B teams migrating a WordPress or HubSpot site to Webflow

Not a fit for

Teams that need a fixed price before the first call

Full review of Veza Digital

Every project is scoped individually and no prices are published; its site puts a standard business website at 4 to 6 weeks. At $150 to $199 an hour it is among the more expensive teams by rate. Two Clutch reviewers flagged schedule slips and internal QA as areas to improve, so agree on QA and milestone dates in writing.

Creative Corner Studio

Creative Corner Studio is a Webflow Premium Partner with an Enterprise distinction, based in Sofia with an Amsterdam office. It builds B2B sites from 5-page launches to large CMS platforms, and reports a 38% organic traffic increase for Gymdesk three months after a WordPress migration.

They possess a rare combination of design sensibility and deep understanding of web development.

Starting price

$5,000+ on Clutch; projects from $12,000 on its pricing page

Hourly rate

$50 to $99

Clutch

5.0/5, 24 reviews

Team and HQ

10 to 49 people, Sofia, Bulgaria

Stack

Webflow (Premium Partner)

Engagement model

Fixed-price projects; monthly hour blocks with rollover

Best for

Teams that want a published price and a fixed quote fast

Not a fit for

Teams that need a SaaS-heavy client list as proof

Full review of Creative Corner Studio

Its pricing page lists projects from $12,000 over 4 to 8 weeks, with CMS setup, integrations, technical SEO and training videos. Figma-to-Webflow builds start at $5,000 and take 10 to 20 business days. Retainer hours fall from $120 to $70 an hour as volume rises, and unused hours roll over for 12 months. Most public Clutch reviews come from smaller companies outside software, so ask for SaaS references.

Webstacks

Webstacks builds composable websites for B2B software companies at scale, using Next.js and headless CMSs such as Sanity, Storyblok and Contentful alongside Webflow and WordPress. Its client list includes Gong, ServiceTitan, Calendly, Snowflake and LogicMonitor, and it runs motion design and product video in-house.

They were incredibly reliable and very professional, and had a great grasp of what we required.

Starting price

$10,000+

Hourly rate

$200 to $300

Clutch

5.0/5, 3 reviews

Team and HQ

50 to 249 people, San Diego, CA

Stack

Next.js, Sanity, Storyblok, Contentful, Webflow, WordPress

Engagement model

Projects and retainers

Best for

Enterprise SaaS deciding between Webflow and a headless build

Not a fit for

Small sites that marketing should run alone

Full review of Webstacks

Webstacks is on this list for teams that are not sure Webflow is enough: it builds both, so the recommendation is less tied to one platform. For a 10-page Series A site the composable approach adds infrastructure the team may not need. At $200 to $300 an hour it is the most expensive team here by rate, and three Clutch reviews make reference calls more important than the rating.

Excited

Excited designs SaaS websites and products and builds the sites in Webflow, with branding, visuals and motion handled by the same team. Recent SaaS work includes ClubReady, InsuredMine, BlueNexus and Xilo, and after launch the team keeps building pages and motion updates.

The team delivered a professional, brand-consistent digital presence that we're actively using.

Starting price

$10,000+

Hourly rate

$50 to $99

Clutch

5.0/5, 56 reviews

Team and HQ

10 to 49 people, Lviv, Ukraine

Stack

Webflow

Engagement model

Projects with post-launch support

Best for

Seed and Series A SaaS sites with strong visuals, built in Webflow

Not a fit for

Teams that need copywriting included

Full review of Excited

Copywriting and positioning are not listed as services, so teams without a clear message should plan to bring copy. With a $10,000 minimum and $50 to $99 hourly rates, Excited is an accessible option for early SaaS companies, and its product design work helps when the site has to show the product.

Halo Lab

Halo Lab designs and develops websites and products from Dubai and Eastern Europe, building in Webflow, React and Next.js with Prismic or Sanity as the CMS. Clients include Ditto, Tessellate and nyra health; Tessellate's CEO said the new site put the young startup ahead of established competitors.

They developed a website that puts us years ahead of our competitors, despite our startup being only a few months old.

Starting price

$10,000+ on Clutch; $5,000 on its own site

Hourly rate

$25 to $49

Clutch

4.9/5, 100 reviews

Team and HQ

50 to 249 people, Dubai, UAE

Stack

Webflow, React, Next.js, Sanity, Prismic

Engagement model

Projects and dedicated monthly teams

Best for

Seed-stage teams that need a Webflow site and product design on a tight budget

Not a fit for

Motion-heavy launch sites

Full review of Halo Lab

Its $25 to $49 hourly rate is the lowest here, which stretches a seed budget, and its 100 Clutch reviews are the largest review base on this list. Webflow is one of several stacks, so confirm that the account gets a Webflow specialist. It does not advertise motion design, and the team is large: ask who leads design on the account.

What does a Webflow agency do?

A Webflow agency designs, builds and runs websites on Webflow. The good ones own the whole path from "what should the site say" to "marketing is publishing pages on its own", not just the build.

Most of what separates them is what they include. In the benchmark, 50% of agencies wrote the copy and 50% expected it from the client, and 20% designed only and built nothing. Two agencies quoting the same page count can be quoting very different jobs.

The seven services a full Webflow agency covers

1. Positioning, messaging and brand identity. Who the site is for, what it should make them do, and the visual identity and storytelling that carry it. A new build cannot fix an unclear message.
2. Research and information architecture. A UX audit of the current site, customer research, then the page list, navigation and the path from homepage to demo or trial.
3. Web design. Layouts, typography, product visuals, advanced interactions and animations, designed for the user experience on desktop and mobile, usually in Figma with a clickable prototype.
4. Webflow development. Classes, components, CMS collections, responsive breakpoints and custom code where the platform stops.
5. Integrations and automation. HubSpot or Salesforce lead generation forms, analytics, consent and privacy tools, scheduling, search and workflow automation.
6. Migration and SEO. Moving content from WordPress, HubSpot or another CMS, with redirects, metadata and structured data carried over.
7. Ongoing support. New pages, landing pages for campaigns, A/B tests, AEO work and maintenance after launch.

Webflow design agency or Webflow development agency?

A Webflow design agency designs the site and builds it; a Webflow development agency mostly builds from designs someone else made. The split matters because a clean build of a weak page is still a weak page. If the brand and the page designs are finished, a development-led team such as Finsweet or Flowout, or a fixed Figma-to-Webflow package such as Creative Corner Studio's, is faster and cheaper. If the site needs a new story, start with an agency that designs.

Buyers notice the difference between the two:

I was not really hearing too many of the other companies I was talking to speak about optimizations. They felt more like designers, but not landing page optimizers where they're like thinking about the word choice, what to highlight, where to put it.

How a Webflow agency differs from a general web agency

A traditional web agency that "also does Webflow" often treats it like any other builder. A Webflow specialist builds a class system and CMS collections that a marketer can extend. It knows where Webflow stops (complex logic, very large CMS structures, heavy e-commerce) and how to work around it with custom code or apps, and it plans the migration as an SEO project. Ask for live Webflow sites, not screenshots.

What Webflow partner tiers and awards tell you

Webflow vets agencies through its Certified Partner programme and lists more than 1,200 Certified Partners in its directory. On top of the base level, agencies display Premium Partner status and an Enterprise distinction for large, complex builds, and Webflow's annual Webflow Awards name an Agency of the Year and an Enterprise Partner of the Year.

Signal	What it tells you	What it does not tell you
Certified Partner	Webflow reviewed the agency's Webflow work	Whether it knows B2B SaaS buyers
Premium Partner	A stronger, proven track record serving Webflow clients	Who will actually work on the project
Enterprise Partner	Experience with large sites, governance and Webflow Enterprise	Whether it suits a 10-page Series A site
Webflow Awards	Peer-recognised craft or delivery in a given year	Price, process or post-launch support
Clutch reviews	Verified client feedback on delivery	Results on sites like yours

Among the agencies above, Flow Ninja (2023) and BX Studio (2025) won Enterprise Partner of the Year, and Edgar Allan won Agency of the Year in 2022 and 2023. The awards also name a Professional Partner of the Year, and Finsweet's open-source tools are used across the Webflow community and ecosystem. Treat any badge as a filter that removes unvetted teams, then judge on live sites in your industry, on measurable outcomes and on references.

Webflow Expert vs Webflow Partner

"Webflow experts" usually means two different things: individual freelancers listed in Webflow's marketplace, and agencies in the Certified Partner programme. A freelancer suits a landing page or a contained update. A partner agency suits a full site, a migration or anything that needs design, development and QA from more than one person.

How much does a Webflow agency cost in 2026?

A Webflow website from an agency usually costs $15,000 to $50,000 for a 5-page marketing site with design, copy and build; the benchmark median was $25,000. Enterprise builds and migrations run higher, and the monthly Webflow plan is a separate bill.

For the same 5-page brief with copywriting and a Webflow or Framer build, the agencies that quoted grouped like this. The third column is editorial guidance from Bricx, not report data:

Price band (as grouped in the report)	Share of agencies that quoted	What it usually buys (editorial)
Under $10,000	25%	Template-led design, client-supplied copy, limited revisions
$15,000 to $50,000	58%	Custom design, copy support, a component-based Webflow build
$50,000 to $100,000+	17%	Brand work, custom illustration or 3D, complex CMS, migrations

The lowest quote was $1,500, the highest $120,000. Hourly rates ran from $25 to $195, with a median between $55 and $90.

What Webflow agencies publish

Few agencies publish prices; these do, and they show how far apart the models are:

Agency	Published price
Creative Corner Studio	Projects from $12,000; Figma to Webflow from $5,000; hour blocks from $120 down to $70 an hour
Amply	Webflow development from $3,000/month; design and Webflow from $4,500/month
Flowout	Subscriptions from $5,900/month (development) to $9,900/month (with design and copy)
Flow Ninja	Project minimums of $30,000 to $45,000; retainers from $6,000/month on 12 months
Bricx	Design and build from $25,000; retainers from $10,000/month
Edgar Allan	$50,000+ minimum on Clutch

What moves the price of a Webflow project

• The homepage visual system. Most of the design cost sits in the first direction; later pages reuse its layouts and sections, so cutting pages saves less than expected.
• Copy. Whether the agency writes it, and whether positioning is included.
• CMS complexity. Collections, filters, multi-reference fields and localisation each add build and QA time.
• Interactions and animations. Every animated state has to be designed before it is built, so motion adds the most cost per page.
• Migration. Moving a blog and keeping its rankings needs a redirect map and QA, not only design.
• Integrations and custom code. HubSpot, Salesforce, gated content, calculators and app-like features.

What Webflow itself costs

Webflow's own plan is paid to Webflow, not to the agency. On Webflow's pricing page in October 2026, the Basic site plan is $15 a month billed yearly (300 static pages, no CMS). The Premium site plan is $25 a month billed yearly, with a CMS of up to 20,000 items and 40 collections. The Team platform plan is $2,500 a month on an annual contract and adds Localize, AEO agents and publishing workflows; Enterprise is priced on request. Analyze and Optimize are paid add-ons. Ask the agency which plan the site needs before the build starts, because CMS limits shape the architecture.

Project or retainer?

Most Webflow agencies sell both. In the benchmark, 45% of agencies priced time and materials, 35% fixed price and 20% a retainer or subscription. A fixed project suits a relaunch with a known page list; a retainer or subscription suits a team that ships landing pages and tests every month. For post-launch support, 40% default to a monthly retainer, 35% bill hourly and 25% sell a prepaid bank of hours.

How long does a Webflow website take?

A 5-page Webflow site takes 5 to 9 weeks at most agencies, and two to three weeks when the designs are already finished.

For the same brief, of the agencies that quoted a timeline, 21.7% quoted 1 to 4 weeks, 43.5% quoted 5 to 9 weeks and 34.8% quoted 10 weeks or more. Published timelines line up: Veza Digital puts a standard business site at 4 to 6 weeks, Creative Corner Studio quotes 4 to 8 weeks, and Bricx quotes five to six weeks for design and build together.

Lead time decides the real date. 45% of agencies could start within one to two weeks of signing, another 45% needed two to four weeks, and 10% a month or more.

A realistic 6-week Webflow plan

Week	Work	What the client team provides
1	Positioning, page list, wireframes	Sales call recordings, ICP, current analytics, URLs that rank
2	Homepage direction and copy draft	One decision-maker with fast feedback
3	Remaining page designs, product visuals	Product access or screen recordings
4 to 5	Webflow build, CMS collections, integrations, page by page	CRM, analytics and consent access
6	Redirects, QA, speed and accessibility checks, launch and training	Who owns the site after launch

Development can start on approved pages while later pages are still in design, which is how shorter timelines hold. The bottleneck is usually feedback, not the agency: projects that keep their date have one decision-maker who returns consolidated feedback within 24 to 48 hours.

Webflow, Framer, WordPress or custom code: which to choose?

Webflow is the right choice for most B2B marketing sites that publish a lot of content and need to look established to larger buyers. Framer suits smaller, design-led sites that change often; WordPress suits large existing libraries with in-house developers; custom code suits sites that share components or data with the product. Among the benchmarked agencies, 65% build on Webflow, 25% on WordPress and 10% on Framer, and 20% design only; agencies could name more than one platform.

	Webflow	Framer	WordPress	Custom code (Next.js + CMS)
Marketing edits without a developer	Yes	Yes	With a page builder	Only within built components
Best for	Content-heavy B2B sites, enterprise buyers	Small, fast, design-led sites	Large existing libraries	Sites sharing code with the product
CMS	Mature collections, up to 20,000 items on the Premium site plan	Simpler, improving	Mature, plugin-based	Whatever is built
Motion	Strong	Strongest out of the box	Depends on the build	Unlimited, costs engineering
Engineering needed after launch	Low	Low	Medium (updates, plugins)	High
Typical risk	Messy class systems on rushed builds	Limits on complex CMS	Plugin sprawl, security patches	Marketing loses independence

In Bricx's own projects, the split between Webflow and Framer is roughly even: smaller sites go to Framer, larger ones such as CAMB.AI to Webflow. Platform perception plays a part too:

The bigger the stage a company is on, the more it trusts Webflow.

Webflow vs WordPress, Webflow vs Framer, and when custom code pays

Webflow vs WordPress: Webflow has hosting, security, forms and SEO settings built in, so there is no plugin stack to patch; WordPress suits teams with a large library and developers who already maintain it. On Bricx sales calls, buyers moving off WordPress describe the same goal: a site the team can change without custom development work every time.

Webflow vs Framer: Framer is faster to build and easier for a non-technical editor; Webflow is stronger for large CMS structures, roles and enterprise governance. The Framer agencies guide compares the Framer specialists, and Bricx's Framer service covers when it fits.

Custom code: sites built with AI coding tools in Next.js perform well, but every edit goes back through engineering. As Bricx's Divij Rakhra put it on a sales call: "If the site is coded in Next.js, the marketing team is blocked on the development team for every small edit to a landing page." Webflow Cloud now hosts apps alongside a Webflow site, which covers tools such as calculators or docs without moving the whole site to code.

Migrating to Webflow without losing rankings

Most Webflow projects for an established company are migrations, usually from WordPress or HubSpot. Rankings survive when the move is run as an SEO project, not a design project:

1. Export every URL with traffic, backlinks or rankings before anything is designed.
2. Keep slugs where possible. A changed URL is a new page to Google.
3. Map every retired URL to its closest new page with a 301 redirect, and rebuild blog and resource content as CMS collections rather than pasting it in.
4. Carry over titles, meta descriptions and structured data, then submit the new sitemap.
5. Watch Search Console for four weeks after launch and fix crawl errors the same day.

Change an existing page's URL and Google treats it as a new page in the sitemap.

Veza Digital, StanVision, Amply, BX Studio and Creative Corner Studio list migrations as a core service; the agency-published results above (Gridwise +24% conversions, Gymdesk +38% organic traffic) came from WordPress to Webflow moves. For a redesign of a site that already ranks, see what a website redesign involves.

What a good Webflow build looks like

Build quality shows up months later: a good Webflow build is one the next person can extend without breaking it. Four things decide that, and each can be checked before signing.

• A named class system. Client-First (Finsweet's convention) or a documented in-house system. Classes named ad hoc mean nobody else can safely edit the site.
• Components and CMS collections shaped around what marketing publishes. Blog posts, case studies, integrations, customer stories, job listings and landing pages should be collection templates or components, not one-off static pages.
• Performance and accessibility as part of QA. Image weight, stacked interactions and third-party scripts decide page speed; contrast, focus states and form labels decide WCAG compliance, which enterprise procurement asks about.
• A real handover. Training, documentation and the site transferred into the client's own Webflow workspace.

We build the website in our workspace, then transfer it to yours. You decide whether to give us access again.

The cheapest version of a Webflow site is often a template, and buyers say so when they come back for a rebuild:

That was a $200 Webflow template we bought 6 months ago because we like quickly need to crank out something.

How AI is changing Webflow builds

Webflow's MCP server lets an agency, or the client's own team, generate pages and CMS items through an AI assistant using the site's existing components. Bricx builds through it and says it accelerates about 80% of the build. The practical effect after launch is that new landing pages no longer need the agency at all, provided the component library is good. As Divij Rakhra described it to a client: "Five months after launch, you can take over the website yourself and use the Webflow MCP with the existing components to create new pages, for example for ads." What AI does not supply is the visual direction, which is why agencies still spend the design phase by hand.

After launch: retainers, WebOps and AEO

A Webflow site starts going stale the month after launch: new features, new pricing, new campaigns. Decide who owns that work before the build.

• The in-house team runs it. Works when the build has a clean component library and someone in marketing owns the site. Ask for training and documentation in the scope.
• A retainer or subscription. Flow Ninja, Grafit, Flowout, Amply and Creative Corner Studio all sell ongoing Webflow work; it suits teams that ship pages and tests every month.
• WebOps. The agency runs the site like a product: a backlog, sprints, performance and SEO monitoring, and experiments. Flow Ninja and Flowout sell this model by name.

AI search is now part of the job. Webflow added AEO tooling to its platform (AEO agents ship on the Team plan, and Analyze reports AI visibility), but having the feature on does not get a site cited. Pages that answer first, state specific facts and use structured tables get quoted by ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews, and they rank better in search engines too. Ask any agency what it changed on a client site to improve AI visibility, and what moved.

Webflow for enterprise teams

Enterprise Webflow work adds governance: roles and permissions, publishing workflows, single-page publishing, localisation for global sites in several markets, security reviews and SSO, on a scalable CMS architecture. Webflow's Team and Enterprise plans carry most of these features, and agencies that publish Enterprise partner status (Flow Ninja, BX Studio, Edgar Allan, Grafit, Flowout, Veza Digital, Finsweet, Amply and Creative Corner Studio) have run them. Ask for an enterprise reference whose site has several teams publishing to it.

Agency, freelancer or in-house Webflow developer?

	Webflow agency	Webflow freelancer	In-house Webflow developer	Webflow subscription
Typical cost	$15,000 to $100,000 per project	Lower per project	Full salary plus tools	$3,000 to $10,000 a month (published retainers above)
Range (copy, design, build, SEO)	Usually covered	Rarely all of it	Rarely all of it	Varies by plan
Speed	Fast with a dedicated team	Depends on one person	Slow to hire, fast once ramped	Fast for small requests
Risk	Senior pitch, junior delivery	Availability; no backup	Single point of failure	Low strategic input
Best for	A relaunch or migration	A contained landing page or update	Constant site work at scale	A steady flow of pages and tests

A common pattern is an agency for the relaunch, then a subscription or one in-house owner who inherits a documented system. A pre-revenue team can launch on one strong landing page and spend the rest on the product.

How to choose a Webflow agency

Write a one-page brief first

The benchmark spread, $1,500 to $120,000 for one brief, came from how each agency read it. A short brief makes quotes comparable:

1. The pages needed at launch, and the ones that can wait.
2. Who writes the copy, and whether positioning is settled.
3. Integrations and technical requirements: CRM, analytics, consent, localisation.
4. URLs that must keep ranking.
5. Which Webflow plan the site needs, and who pays for it.
6. The one decision-maker and their feedback turnaround.
7. The launch date and the post-launch model.

Ten questions to ask a Webflow agency

1. Which three live Webflow sites are closest to this one, and what changed after launch?
2. Who designs and who builds, and do they work only on this account?
3. Which class-naming system does the build use?
4. How are CMS collections planned around what the marketing team will publish?
5. How are redirects, metadata and Search Console handled after a migration?
6. Who writes the copy, and is positioning included?
7. What does training and documentation include at handover?
8. Whose Webflow workspace is the site built in, and when is it transferred?
9. What does support cost after launch, and how is it billed?
10. Can the agency share two past clients to call?

Red flags

• No live Webflow sites to open, only Dribbble shots or mockups.
• No answer to which class system they use, or who edits the site after launch.
• Partner status presented as the main reason to hire them.
• A proposal that starts with visual design and skips page structure and copy; a conversion-focused agency starts with what the page has to make visitors do.
• Slow or vague communication and collaboration during the sales process, which rarely improves once the project starts.
• A migration plan with no redirect map.
• A fixed price with no definition of a revision round.
• Senior people on the sales call and nobody from delivery.

For SaaS-specific needs beyond the platform, the SaaS website design agencies guide compares agencies on product and website work, the design agencies for YC startups guide narrows to early-stage teams and the product design agencies guide covers the product behind the site.

FAQs

What is the best Webflow agency in 2026?

For B2B and AI SaaS companies, Bricx, which designs Webflow sites to convert and builds them so marketing can run them without engineering, from $25,000. For enterprise Webflow sites, Flow Ninja, BX Studio and Edgar Allan, which have won Webflow's partner or agency awards. For smaller budgets, Creative Corner Studio, Amply and Flowout publish prices from $3,000 a month or $12,000 a project.

What does a Webflow agency do?

It designs, builds and maintains websites on Webflow: positioning and page structure, web design, Webflow development with components and CMS collections, integrations, migrations from other platforms, SEO and AEO, and ongoing support. Half of agencies also write the copy; ask before comparing quotes, because the other half is quoting a smaller job.

How much does a Webflow agency cost?

A 5-page Webflow site with design, copy and build had a median quote of $25,000 among the agencies that quoted in Bricx's benchmark (sales calls with 57 agencies on the same brief), and 58% of them quoted between $15,000 and $50,000. Published retainers run from $3,000 to $10,000 a month. The Webflow plan is extra: $15 or $25 a month billed yearly for most marketing sites, $2,500 a month for the Team plan.

How long does it take to build a Webflow website?

Most agencies quote 5 to 9 weeks for a 5-page site (43.5% of the benchmark), and a build from finished designs takes two to three weeks. Add the agency's lead time, two to four weeks at 45% of agencies. Larger sites and migrations take two to three months. Bricx quotes five to six weeks for design and build, and Billdr's CEO reported delivery about three weeks ahead of schedule in a Clutch review.

What is the difference between a Webflow Certified, Premium and Enterprise Partner?

All are vetted by Webflow. Certified Partner is the base level of the programme, which lists more than 1,200 partners. Premium Partner marks agencies with a stronger record of Webflow client work, and the Enterprise distinction marks experience with large, complex builds on Webflow Enterprise. None of them tells you whether an agency knows your industry.

Should a company hire a Webflow agency or a Webflow freelancer?

A freelancer suits a landing page, a contained update or a build from finished designs. An agency suits a relaunch, a migration or a site that needs design, copy, build and QA together, because it has backup when one person is away. Many teams use an agency for the relaunch and a freelancer or subscription afterwards.

What is the difference between a Webflow design agency and a Webflow development agency?

A Webflow design agency designs the site and builds it; a development agency mainly builds from designs someone else made. If the brand and designs are finished, a development-led team is faster and cheaper. If the site needs a new story or visual direction, start with an agency that designs.

Can a Webflow agency migrate a WordPress site without losing rankings?

Yes, when the move is run as an SEO project: export every ranking URL, keep slugs where possible, 301-redirect every retired URL, carry over titles, metadata and structured data, rebuild the blog as CMS collections, and watch Search Console for four weeks. Ask to see a migration the agency ran end to end.

Is Webflow good for SaaS websites?

Yes, for most B2B SaaS marketing sites: 65% of benchmarked agencies build on it (agencies could name more than one platform), marketing can publish without engineers, and the CMS handles blogs, integrations, case studies and landing pages. Framer suits smaller, fast-changing sites, and a custom build suits sites that share components with the product.

Do Webflow agencies handle SEO and AEO?

Most handle technical SEO during the build and migration: redirects, metadata, structured data, sitemaps and page speed. Fewer run ongoing SEO or AEO, the work of getting cited in AI answers. Flow Ninja, Flowout, BX Studio, Veza Digital and Creative Corner Studio sell it as a service; ask what changed on a client site.

Who maintains a Webflow site after launch?

Either the client's marketing team, a retainer with the agency, or a Webflow subscription. In the benchmark, 40% of agencies default to a monthly retainer, 35% bill hourly and 25% sell a prepaid bank of hours. A clean component library and training decide whether the in-house team can run it alone.

Who owns the Webflow site and design files?

The client should. Confirm in the contract that the site is transferred to the company's own Webflow workspace, and that Figma files, fonts and image licences are handed over at the end. Agencies often build in their own workspace and transfer at launch.

Which Webflow agency is best for enterprise websites?

Flow Ninja, BX Studio and Edgar Allan have the strongest enterprise records here. Flow Ninja and BX Studio won Webflow's Enterprise Partner of the Year in 2023 and 2025, and Edgar Allan won Agency of the Year twice. Webstacks suits enterprise teams still deciding between Webflow and a headless build.

Which Webflow agency is best for startups?

For funded startups relaunching brand and site, Bricx, StanVision and Grafit, all with $25,000 minimums. For seed budgets, Creative Corner Studio, Amply, Excited and Halo Lab, with Clutch minimums of $5,000 to $10,000. A pre-revenue team may only need one strong landing page. For examples of strong software sites, see the best SaaS website examples.

What big companies use Webflow?

Agency client lists show how far Webflow now reaches, from high-growth startups to large tech companies: Dropbox, Vanta and GitHub (Finsweet), Reddit, Headspace and Verifone (BX Studio), Upwork (Flow Ninja), Jasper and Kajabi (Flowout), and Webflow itself is a Refokus client.

Webflow or Framer for a startup website?

Framer for a small site that a non-technical founder will edit often and that needs to launch fast. Webflow for a site that will grow past 10 to 15 pages, publish a lot of content, or be read by enterprise buyers who see the platform as a signal. Several agencies above, including Bricx, Refokus and BX Studio, build in both.

Why do so many agencies build on Webflow?

Because it lets marketing teams publish without engineers while the agency keeps design control: hosting, security, forms, CMS and SEO settings are built in, so there is no plugin stack to maintain. In the benchmark, 65% of agencies build on Webflow, against 25% on WordPress and 10% on Framer; agencies could name more than one platform.