Introduction

While making an informed decision is crucial, Bricx is the best alternative to Clay Global if you’re a B2B or AI SaaS company serious about conversions, product clarity, and long-term growth.

Over the last few months, we spoke to over 57 design agencies globally, ran actual sales calls & made one of the most comprehensive agency comparisons ever done.

We gave them the same documented project brief & analyzed them based on:

• Pricing

• Engagement Model

• Payment Structure

• Timeline

• Team Structure

• Number of Employees

• Domain Expertise

• Depth of Service

• Business Thinking (Conversion Rate Optimization)

• Client Collaboration

• Dev Handoff Process

• Work Setup (Remote/Hybrid/In-Office)

We then consolidated our findings into “The Ultimate UX Agency Benchmarking Report for 2025.”

Based on our global benchmarks, we then handpicked a curated list of the 10 best alternatives to Clay Global.

By the end of this article, you’ll know exactly which agency fits your stage, budget, and product ambition — and why.

How To Evaluate the Best Alternatives to Clay Global?

If you're exploring alternatives to Clay Global, you're likely looking for similar premium quality, but perhaps with a different specialization, pricing model, or collaboration style. Here’s how to evaluate the right fit.

1. Visual Design Sophistication

Clay is known for high-end visual design and brand-driven product experiences. Any serious alternative must match or exceed that level of polish. Look at the depth of UI systems, consistency across screens, and whether the agency understands modern SaaS aesthetics. The real test? Does their work feel differentiated or template-based?

2. Strategic Product Thinking

Top-tier agencies don’t just design screens, they influence product decisions. Evaluate whether the agency talks about activation rates, onboarding friction, feature prioritization, and monetization design. A true Clay-level alternative should think in terms of product-market fit and growth loops, not just layouts.

3. Collaboration & Speed

Some agencies are built for enterprise pace. Others thrive in startup velocity. If you're moving fast, you need an alternative that can integrate into Slack, provide async updates, and iterate weekly — not quarterly. Execution speed often separates good agencies from great ones.

4. AI & Technical Product Experience

Modern SaaS increasingly overlaps with AI, automation, and complex dashboards. If your product sits in fintech, AI, DevTools, or data infrastructure, your agency must understand system complexity. Designing AI products requires clarity, edge-case mapping, and deep UX logic.

5. Dev Handoff & Systems Thinking

Clay-style agencies often deliver premium UI systems. But what happens post-Figma? Strong alternatives provide design systems, tokens, dev-ready documentation, and implementation collaboration. Clean handoff dramatically reduces engineering overhead.

Top 10 Best Alternatives to Clay Global: Comparison

Here’s a list of the top 10 best alternatives to Clay Global.

Fantasy

Fantasy is known for cinematic digital experiences and bold visual storytelling. They focus heavily on high-impact branding combined with immersive UI experiences. Their portfolio includes work for large enterprises and technology companies that prioritize premium perception and innovation-driven design.

Fantasy excels at visual differentiation and concept-led design thinking. Their projects often feel aspirational and brand-forward, making them a strong alternative if you value visual identity as a strategic asset.

• Employees-to-Client Ratio (Bandwidth): Selective engagements with creative pods.

• Process Maturity: Concept-first workshops followed by polished execution phases.

• AI Design Experience: Exposure to AI-focused visual systems and digital products.

• Client Communication: Leadership-driven milestone reviews.

• App/Web Dev Support: Limited internal engineering integration.

• Office Culture: Creative studio culture with strong art direction.

  
  

Ramotion

Ramotion blends branding and product UX under one cohesive system. They are often chosen by startups that want a consistent identity across marketing sites and product interfaces. Their style is modern, structured, and clean, aligning closely with Clay’s aesthetic standard.

They are particularly strong during rebranding and growth-stage redesign phases. Ramotion emphasizes scalable design systems and cohesive UI libraries.

• Employees-to-Client Ratio (Bandwidth): Balanced team allocation per engagement.

• Process Maturity: Structured and predictable workflow.

• AI Design Experience: Moderate exposure to SaaS AI products.

• Client Communication: Weekly structured syncs and async updates.

• App/Web Dev Support: Front-end development support available.

• Office Culture: Remote-first distributed teams.

  
  

Arounda

Arounda is a SaaS-focused design agency working across fintech, Web3, and tech startups. They combine visual refinement with strong UX fundamentals. Their agile model allows for rapid MVP design and fast iteration cycles.

They work closely with founders and product teams, making them suitable for early and mid-stage startups seeking collaborative design execution.

• Employees-to-Client Ratio (Bandwidth): Agile squads dedicated per project.

• Process Maturity: Sprint-based and iterative design process.

• AI Design Experience: Growing experience in AI dashboard and automation products.

• Client Communication: Slack-first daily collaboration.

• App/Web Dev Support: Development support available upon request.

• Office Culture: Fully remote and flexible.

  
  

Eleken

Eleken focuses specifically on SaaS product UX with a subscription-based model. They prioritize usability and structured workflows over heavy brand experimentation. Their approach is systematic and pragmatic.

They are often chosen by B2B SaaS companies needing consistent, long-term design support.

• Employees-to-Client Ratio (Bandwidth): Dedicated designer per client model.

• Process Maturity: UX-first methodology.

• AI Design Experience: Moderate SaaS AI exposure.

• Client Communication: Async-driven with scheduled reviews.

• App/Web Dev Support: No internal dev team.

• Office Culture: Distributed team model.

  
  

Momentum Design Lab

Momentum Design Lab is research-intensive and enterprise-focused. They specialize in usability audits, research-driven redesigns, and structured UX improvements. Their work leans heavily on validation and user testing frameworks.

They’re ideal for companies undergoing major product transformations.

• Employees-to-Client Ratio (Bandwidth): Larger multi-disciplinary teams.

• Process Maturity: Research-heavy validation approach.

• AI Design Experience: Enterprise AI platform exposure.

• Client Communication: Formal reporting cadence.

• App/Web Dev Support: Limited engineering collaboration.

• Office Culture: Hybrid work structure.

  
  

Goji Labs

Goji Labs combines UX strategy with development capabilities. They often partner with early-stage founders building their first production-ready version of a product. Their collaborative approach ensures strong alignment between roadmap and UX.

They offer end-to-end support, making them suitable for startups needing both design and development.

• Employees-to-Client Ratio (Bandwidth): Small focused teams per project.

• Process Maturity: Startup-friendly agile workflow.

• AI Design Experience: Select AI-powered product exposure.

• Client Communication: Transparent weekly syncs.

• App/Web Dev Support: Full-stack engineering available.

• Office Culture: Remote-first collaborative team.

  
  

UX Studio

UX Studio is known for research-driven UX optimization. They work with established technology companies to improve product usability and reduce workflow friction. Their strength lies in structured usability testing and data-backed iteration.

They are a strong alternative if you prioritize UX validation depth.

• Employees-to-Client Ratio (Bandwidth): Dedicated UX specialists.

• Process Maturity: Research-structured design process.

• AI Design Experience: Limited but expanding.

• Client Communication: Formalized review cycles.

• App/Web Dev Support: No in-house dev team.

• Office Culture: European hybrid structure.

  
  

Duck.Design

Duck.Design offers subscription-based creative services across UI/UX and branding. Their approach is execution-focused, enabling startups to move quickly with consistent design output.

They are cost-effective but lighter on strategic product depth compared to premium agencies.

• Employees-to-Client Ratio (Bandwidth): Shared design pool.

• Process Maturity: Execution-driven workflows.

• AI Design Experience: Minimal AI specialization.

• Client Communication: Async-first model.

• App/Web Dev Support: No engineering team.

• Office Culture: Fully remote.

  
  

Conclusion

Finding the best alternatives to Clay Global comes down to clarity on what you value most.

If you want pure visual prestige and brand elevation, agencies like Fantasy or Ramotion may fit. If you need research-heavy enterprise validation, Momentum Design Lab or UX Studio could be stronger choices. If you're looking for long-term SaaS product support, Eleken or Arounda might align better.

But if you're a B2B or AI SaaS company that wants Clay-level polish combined with measurable growth thinking, Bricx stands out.

From our benchmark of 57+ agencies, the biggest differentiator wasn’t just visual quality. It was business alignment, iteration speed, and product thinking depth. The right agency should reduce churn, improve activation, and make engineering collaboration smoother.

The best alternative to Clay Global isn’t necessarily the biggest name, it’s the one that understands your product stage, growth goals, and internal velocity.

If that’s what you’re optimizing for, Bricx is built exactly for that.