(01)
We design it before we build it
A fast build of a weak page just gets you somewhere wrong sooner. The argument and the layout come first.

Trusted by SF’s top AI & SaaS companies
And many more
Framer projects reach us for one of two reasons. The date is fixed, or the last site left marketing completely dependent on engineering.
Book a callThere is a launch date and the site will not make it.
A custom build will not clear the date without cutting the parts that matter.
Design and build are two vendors and two timelines.
The design lands, someone else interprets it, and the result is a negotiation nobody scheduled.
The motion in the file never survives the build.
Everything that made the design feel considered gets dropped as too fiddly to implement.
You are paying custom-code prices for five pages.
Custom code is the right answer for some sites and an expensive one for most marketing sites.
Your marketer cannot change a headline alone.
Every edit becomes a ticket, so campaigns stop shipping and the site goes stale.
It was built fast and now nobody can extend it.
No components, no CMS, and a page count that grows by duplication.
“Bricx delivered the website, designs, and image assets. They had good time management and went above and beyond.”

Jesse Xu
CTO @ Podqi
We wireframe every page before anyone picks a colour. This is where the argument gets stress tested, and where the page count usually comes down. If it works in grey boxes, the design will make it better rather than rescue it.
Typical outputs:
We start with moodboards, not layouts. Three or four directions, you comment straight into the Figma file, and one gets locked. Then we design every page and every state, plus the motion that goes with them.
Typical outputs:
We build in Framer with real components rather than duplicated sections, so the site grows without turning into forty unconnected pages. Around 80% of the build is accelerated through the Framer MCP, and the remaining 20% is what makes it look designed.
Typical outputs:
The CMS is the whole point of choosing Framer. We structure your collections properly, set up dynamic pages, and hand it to your marketing team with training so nobody ever files a ticket for a copy change.
Typical outputs:
We launch without losing what you already earn. Every 301 mapped, metadata carried across, ranking URLs preserved, and a performance pass before anything goes live.
Typical outputs:


(01)
A fast build of a weak page just gets you somewhere wrong sooner. The argument and the layout come first.
(02)
Interaction is designed alongside the pages and built by the same team, so it does not get dropped as too fiddly.
(03)
A landing page takes one to two weeks and a full site three to five. You can put the first page live before the rest is finished.
(04)
Collections, dynamic pages and training, so nobody files a ticket to change a headline.
Framer is the fastest route from a decision to a live site. That only matters if the site is worth shipping, so we design it first, build the motion with it, and hand it to your team rather than back to your engineers.
01
AI does the layouts and the first drafts now. What it cannot do is the last ten percent, and that is the whole difference.
02
Designed and built by one team, so what you approved in the file is what goes live.
03
A landing page in one to two, a full site in three to five, without cutting the parts that decide how it reads.
04
Framer is worth choosing because your marketer can run it. We set the CMS up so that is true on day one.
Ranked three years running

30+ verified reviews on Clutch.
Trusted by top SaaS
“We handed Bricx a vague brief and got back a brand that felt inevitable. That’s rare.”

Chirag Kulkarni
CEO @Hobbes
99.7%
Client Satisfaction
30+
Industries
50+ Projects
| Options | Landing page | Full site | Site + brand |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | One page, one campaign | A complete marketing site | A launch or reposition |
| Typical length | 1 to 2 weeks | 3 to 5 weeks | 6 to 8 weeks |
| Who you get | One designer | Designer plus developer | Designer, lead, developer |
| Commitment | Fixed scope | Milestone based | Milestone based |
| What is included | Design, build, CMS | Everything, all pages, CMS | Everything, plus identity |

Zero risk. Real design work delivered before you commit to anything.
Framer is faster, cheaper and far easier for a marketer to change. Webflow has the stronger CMS and still reads as more established to enterprise buyers. We recommend one on the first call.
Yes. CMS variables drive meta titles and descriptions per page, related posts work through plugins, and filtering is handled the same way. The limitations people cite are mostly out of date.
One to two weeks for a landing page. Three to five for a full marketing site. Once the visual direction is locked, an individual page moves in two to four days.
A single high-craft landing page starts around $12,000 with development included. Full sites start at $25,000. Build-only work against finished designs sits below both.
Not if it is handled properly. We map every 301, carry metadata across, and preserve the URLs that already earn traffic.
Yes, and it is most of the reason to choose Framer. We structure the collections around what your team publishes and hand it over with training.
No, and we say so on the first call. You know your product’s wording better than we will. We build the narrative and a page-by-page brief with you first, then your team writes into it. Copy is the most common cause of delay, so start early.
Every file, and you own all of it. Design source, the built project, documentation and, where we wrote it, the code in your repository from the first commit.
Yes. We will connect you with a founder we have done this for, so you hear how it went from their side rather than ours.
We work almost entirely with B2B SaaS and AI companies, across fintech, healthcare, logistics, legal, edtech and infrastructure. If we have not worked in your category, we say so and tell you what that changes.